Chemistry, Physics and Technology of Surface, 2017, 8 (1), 65-72.

Effect of microstructure of modified diatomite on its adsorption properties



DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/hftp08.01.065

T. Ia. Datsko, V. I. Zelentsov

Abstract


The effect of microstructural changes caused by chemical modification of diatomite with aluminosilicate nanoparticles on its adsorption properties with respect to fluorine has been elucidated.

The surface modification of diatomite with aluminosilicate is accompanied with significant changes in its structure and chemical properties – a growth of specific surface area, a shift of electro-superficial properties and an increase of adsorption capacity for fluorine. Moreover, some kind of synergism takes place after modification: adsorption capacity of aluminosilicate species grafted on the diatomite surface is higher than that of bulk aluminosilicate.

The surface-chemical modification of diatomite has been carried out by heating it in a NaOH solution and subsequent treatment with a solution of aluminum salt and after that with ammonia. Amorphous surface silica partially dissolves during the treatment with NaOH and due to addition of an aluminum salt it forms an aluminosilicate compound. The obtained product is further denoted as DMA.

The increase in the specific surface area of DMA is connected with variation of the ratio of the micro- and mesopores through the filling of the large mesopores with aluminosilicate and its own microporous structure increment; the specific surface area gets 81.8 m2/g, which is 2.5 times larger than the corresponding value of the initial unprocessed diatomite (37.5 m2/g). Partial substitution of Si atoms in silicates of diatomite surface by Al atoms creates as a result of their different valences an excess negative charge, and pHPZC of the sorbent surface shifts to higher values compared to initial diatomite sample that facilitates the attraction of more negatively charged ions from solution. Both these phenomena lead to that adsorption capacity of modified diatomite (DMA) with respect to fluorine is considerably increased from 10 to 58 mmol/g.

Aluminosilicate in the DMA composition has 1.3 times greater adsorption capacity with respect to fluorine compared to bulk synthetic aluminosilicate. Since the reactive sites responsible for the adsorption are essentially surface aluminum ions, it is expected that their concentration is closely associated with the content of Al2O3 in aluminosilicate. It is easy to understand that not all the silica in diatomite matrix, but the surface only was subjected to the substitution of Si atoms with Al, so the surface aluminosilicate composition must contain the increased ratio of Al2O3/ SiO2; it is 0.5 according to some calculation compared to the volume ratio which is 0.33; besides, the surface aluminosilicate is more or less uniformly distributed on the pore material surface, so more aluminum sites are accessible for interaction with fluoride ions. Furthermore, molecular aluminum and silicon precursors are preferentially grafted on sites that enable the formation of Al(IV) coordination form, and deposited aluminum species on silica are Al(IV) tetrahedrally coordinated species. This specific surface site connectivity eventually enables the formation of Brønsted acid sites. Such acid sites may be formulated as bridging hydroxyls in connection with Al(IV) species, such as pseudo-bridging silanol in Al/SiO2, therefore more fluorine is involved in complexes with Al.

Apparently,all of the above facts together should be responsible for an increased adsorption capacity of the surface aluminosilicate in the DMA composition.


Keywords


diatomite; chemical-structural modification; nano-sized aluminosilicate; fluorine; adsorption

Full Text:

PDF

References


1. Tewari A. and Dubey A. Defluoridation of drinking water: efficacy and need. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2009. 1(1): 31.

2. Mahramanlioglu M., Kizilcikli I., Bicer I.O. Adsorption of fluoride from aqueous solution by acid treated spent bleaching earth. J. Fluorine Chem. 2002. 115(1): 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1139(02)00003-9

3. Fan X., Parker D.J., Smith M.D. Adsorption kinetics of fluoride on low cost materials. Water Res. 2003. 37(20): 4929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2003.08.014

4. Zhang Y., Wang D., Liu B., Gao X., Xu W., Liang P., Xu Y. Adsorption of fluoride from aqueous solution using low-cost bentonite/chitosan beads. American Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 2013. 4(7): 48. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajac.2013.47A007

5. Zhang J., Chen N., Tang Z., Yu Y., Hu Q., Feng C. Adsorption of fluoride from aqueous solutions onto Fe-impregnated chitosan and mechamism study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015. 17(18): 12041. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP00817D

6. Ramos R.L., Turrubiartes J.O., Castillo M.A.S. Adsorption of fluoride from aqueous solution on aluminium-impregnated carbon. Carbon. 1999. 37(4): 609. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(98)00231-0

7. Tripathy S.S., Raichur A.M. Abatement of fluoride from water using manganese dioxide-coated activated alumina. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008. 153(3): 1043.

8. Zelentsov V.I., Datsko T.Ya., Dvornikova E.E. Fluorine Adsorption by aluminum oxihydrates subjected to thermal treatment. Surf. Eng. Appl. Electrochem. 2008. 44(1): 64. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068375508010134

9. Zelentsov V., Datsko T. Active pore materials based on sludge of Cr-Ni alloy electrochemical machining. Moldavian J. Phys. Sci. 2006. 5(2): 162.

10. Zelentsov V., Datsko T., Dvornikova E. Studiul aplicabilitatii diatomitului modificat pentru inlaturarea ionilor de fluor din apele naturale. In: Mediul si Industria, Proc. Int. Symp. (2005, Romania, Bucharest). 1: 213.

11. Datsko T.Ya., Zelentsov V.I., Dvornikova E.E. Physicochemical and adsorption structural properties of diatomite modified with aluminum compounds. Surf. Eng. Appl. Electrochem. 2011. 47(6): 530. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068375511060081

12. Datsko T.Y., Zelentsov V.I. Fluorine sorption by aluminosilicate-modified diatomite from highly concentrated fluorine solutions: 1. Adsorption equilibrium. Surf. Eng. Appl. Electrochem. 2016. 52(3): 300. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068375516030042

13. Sposito G. The Chemistry of Soils. Second Edition, 7.3. Surface. Charge (Oxford: University Press, 2008).

14. Jara A. A., Goldberg S., Mora M.L. Studies of the surface charge of amorphous aluminosilicates using surface complexation models. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005. 292(1): 160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2005.05.083

15. Yuan P., Wu D.Q., He H.P., Lin Z.Y. The hydroxyl species and acid sites on diatomite surface: a combined IR and Raman study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2004. 227(1–4): 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2003.10.031

16. Inoue K., Satoh C. Electric charge and surface characteristics of hydroxyaluminosilicate- and hydroxyaluminum-vermiculite complexes. Clays Clay Miner. 1992. 40(3): 314. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1992.0400310

17. Tombacz E. pH-dependent surface charging of metal oxides. Chem. Eng. 2009. 53(2):77. https://doi.org/10.3311/pp.ch.2009-2.08

18. James R.O., Parks G.A. Characterization of aqueous colloids by their electrical double-layer and intrinsic surface chemical properties. Surf. Colloid Sci. 1982. 12: 119. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3204-6_2

19. Reyes Bahena J.L., Robledo C.A., Lopez V.A, Herrera U.R. Fluoride adsorption onto γ-Al2O3 and its effect on the zeta potential at the alumina-aqueous electrolyte interface. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2002. 37(8): 1973. https://doi.org/10.1081/SS-120003055

20. Gago C., Romar A., Fernandez-Marcos M. L., Alvarez E. Fluoride sorption and desorption on soils located in the surroundings of an aluminium smelter in Galicia (NW Spain). Environmental Earth Sciences. 2014. 72(10): 4105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3304-8

21. Takimoto K., Fujita A., Tsuda, S. Adsorption of phosphate on synthetic silica-alumina possessing Lewis-acid sites. Bull Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1977. 50(9): 2479. https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.50.2479

22. Rajan S.S.S., Perrott K.W. Phosphate adsorption by synthetic amorphous aluminosilicates. Eur. J. Soil. Sci. 1975. 26(3): 257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1975.tb01950.x

23. Pfleiderer P., Horbach J., Binder K. Structure and transport properties of amorphous aluminium silicates: computer simulation studies. Chem. Geol. 2005. 229(1–3): 1.

24. Kelsey K., Stebbins J.F., Mosenfelder J.L., Asimow P.D. Simultaneous aluminum, silicon, and sodium coordination changes in 6 GPa sodium aluminosilicate glass. Am. Mineral. 2009. 94(8–9): 1205. https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2009.3177

25. Tsomaia N., Brantley S.L., Hamilton J.P., Pantano C.G., Mueller K.T. NMR evidence for formation of octahedral and tetrahedral Al and repolymerization of the Si network during dissolution of aluminosilicate glass and crystal. Am. Mineral. 2003. 88(1): 54. https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2003-0107

26. Okazaki M., Kimiwada K., Katsumata H. Adsorption of ions on synthetic amorphous aluminosilicates with different SiO2/A12O3 molar ratios and coordination numbers of aluminum. Soil. Sci. Plant Nutr. 1989. 35(1): 109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.1989.10434742

27. Valla M., Rossini A.J., Caillot M., Chizallet C., Raybaud P., Digne M., Chaumonnot A., Lesage A., Emsley L., van Bokhoven J.A., Coperet Ch. Atomic description of the interface between silica and alumina in aluminosilicates through dynamic nuclear polarization surface- enhanced NMR spectroscopy and first-principles calculations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015. 137(33): 10710. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b06134




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/hftp08.01.065

Copyright (©) 2017 T. Ia. Datsko, V. I. Zelentsov

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.